data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d28b2/d28b26304d724caa18ea6e2a7104c25d50f2797e" alt="Show Menu"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e4ec/4e4ecc0a122f94d36d2ecdcb7c4cfb7cf98d2850" alt="Page Background"
advantages and disadvantages. The Royal Free London NHS
Foundation Trust screens all patients considered
‘
high-risk
’
for
colonisation with CPO.
Aim(s)/Objective(s):
To review current CPO screening methodology
and results from samples received during Jan-Apr 2016, with
particular focus on carbapenemase types identified and turn-around
times.
Method(s):
Screening samples are cultured on chromogenic media;
the penicillin/cephalosporin antibiogram, together with MICs to
relevant carbapenems, are then used to identify potential CPOs
(pCPOs). These are tested by KPC/MBL Confirm Kit (Enterobacteria-
ceae) or KPC/MBL Confirm in
P. aeruginosa/Acinetobacter
Kit [Rosco
Diagnostica]. Possible OXA-48 positive Enterobacteriaceae are high-
lighted by resistance to Temocillin and require Reference Laboratory
confirmation.
Results:
During Jan
–
Apr 2016 inclusive, 3775 screening samples (1735
patients) were tested for CPO. 3664/3775 (97.06%) samples were
shown to be negative for CPO using chromogenic media and/or
antibiogram analysis.
pCPOs were isolated from 111/3775
(2.94%) samples from 77/1735 (4.43%) patients, of which 54 [from 52
patients] represented non-duplicate isolates that were tested for
carbapenemase production. 22/54 were confirmed CPOs (41% of
pCPO samples, 42% of pCPO patients, 0.6% of screening samples,
1.3% of patients screened): 8 OXA-48, 5 VIM, 4 NDM, 4 OXA-23 and
1 KPC.
Discussion and/or Conclusion(s):
OXA-48 represented 36.4% of the
CPOs detected, highlighting a need to adapt our protocol to improve
detection of this genotype, particularly with regard to turn-around
time which currently relies on Reference Laboratory confirmation.
Consequently, we are evaluating RapidEC CarbaNP [Biomerieux] and
Xpert Carba-R PCR [Cepheid] to improve detection of CPOs.
ID: 4870
Review of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
sensitivity testing protocol
for resistant strains at the Scottish Mycobacteria Reference
Laboratory
Alex Kennett
1
, Pauline Claxton
2
, Ian Laurenson
2
.
1
NHS Lothian,
2
Scottish Mycobacteria Reference Laboratory
Background:
The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimated that
multi-drug resistance (MDR) was found in 3.3% of new cases of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
(TB) in 2014 and 20% of previously treated
cases.
Aim(s)/Objective(s):
To assess the utility of extended Drug
Susceptibility Testing (DST) carried out on resistant TB isolates at the
Scottish Mycobacterial Reference Laboratory (SMRL).
Method(s):
The use of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system, second line TB
eXiST testing, TREK sensititre MYCOTB MIC plates, Hain GenoType
MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl genotypic testing on 44 resistant clinical
isolates was examined between the end of January 2014 and 11th June
2015.
Results:
18 isolates showed mono-drug resistance; isoniazid (10),
pyrazinamide (7) and streptomycin (1). 26 isolates were resistant to
more than one drug. 6 were multi-drug resistant and 2 were extremely
drug resistant. Complete phenotypic and genotypic testing was carried
on the majority of samples with 100% isolates tested using MGIT 960
system, TB eXist software and MYCOTB MIC plates, 100% were tested
with MTBDRplus and 93.2% (n = 41) with MTBDRsl testing. In total,
only 3 (6.8%) of isolates showed inconsistent results between the
different modalities of testing and 1 demonstrated ethambutol
resistance after extended incubation.
Discussion and/or Conclusion(s):
On the basis of this review, resis-
tance testing was streamlined to carry out MTBDRplus and second line
TB eXist testing on mono-resistant isolates, reserving MYCOTB plates
and MTBDRsl testing for multiple drug resistant isolates.
ID: 4922
Improving detection of CPOs in the diagnostic microbiology
laboratory
Hema Sharma
1
, Gemma Vanstone
2
, Indran Balakrishnan
1
.
1
Royal Free
London NHS Foundation Trust,
2
HSL Analytics
Background:
To aid identification of carbapenemase producing
organisms (CPOs), The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust uses
susceptibility profiles to penicillins and cephalosporins, alongside
MICs to relevant carbapenems. Possible CPOs are then tested by KPC/
M
β
L Confirm (Enterobacteriaceae) or KPC/M
β
L Confirm (
P. aeruginosa
/
Acinetobacter
) Kits [Rosco Diagnostica]
–
results are available 24 h
later. Due to the inability of Rosco assays to detect OXA-48, resistance
to temocillin is used as a surrogate marker for this genotype; possible
OXA-48s require Reference Laboratory (AMRHAI, PHE) confirmation,
which incurs a delay of 3
–
5 d.
Patients with possible CPOs are isolated in side-rooms and removed
if/when isolates are confirmed negative. Reducing turnaround-time
(TAT) to CPO detection will optimise both infection control and
antibiotic stewardship.
Aim(s)/Objective(s):
To improve CPO detection TAT with use of
RapidEC CarbaNP [Biomerieux] and Xpert Carba-R [Cepheid] assays.
Method(s):
42 unique isolates from screening specimens received
between Jan-Apr 2016 meeting susceptibility criteria for carbapene-
mase testing were additionally tested by RapidEC CarbaNP and Xpert
Carba-R. All isolates were sent to AMRHAI for confirmation.
Results:
AMRHAI identified 19/42 CPOs [8 OXA-48, 5 NDM, 4 VIM, 1
KPC, 1 OXA-23]. Our in-house method of Rosco plus temocillin
susceptibility (100% sensitivity, 43.5% specificity) lacked specificity
due to its inability to detect OXA-48s. The RapidEC CarbaNP (100.0%
sensitivity, 91.3% specificity) and Xpert CarbaR (94.7% sensitivity, 100%
specificity) performed well and detected all OXA-48 positive CPOs
with results available within 1.5
–
3 h.
Discussion and/or Conclusion(s):
Both RapidEC CarbaNP and Xpert
CarbaR assays improved TAT to CPO detection (particularly OXA-48s).
Xpert Carba-R had the additional advantage of determining carbape-
nemase type.
ID: 4929
Diagnostic accuracy evaluation of the RenDx Fungiplex assay for
detection of candidaemia
Cara McKeating
1
, Raquel Posso
2
, Lewis White
2
, Ronan McMullan
1,3
.
1
Microbiology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust,
2
Regional Mycology
Unit, Public Health Wales Microbiology Cardiff, University Hospital of
Wales,
3
Centre for Experimental Medicine, Queens University Belfast
Background:
The Renishaw RenDx Fungiplex is a new PCR-based
test that detects
Candida
/
Aspergillus
DNA in blood/serum/plasma
specimens.
Aim(s)/Objective(s):
The aimwas to provide preliminary evaluation of
the diagnostic accuracy of this test, for detection of candidaemia in the
NHS service context.
Method(s):
Twelve consecutive adults with candidaemia were identi-
fied prospectively. For 11 of these patients serum taken contempor-
aneously with the blood culture was available and was stored at
−
70°C
for batch analysis. Where possible, serum obtained the preceding
and/or following day was also collected. Serum from thirty-nine adults
with a paired negative blood culture was also collected in a similar
manner for negative controls. Staff performing PCR testing were
blinded to the culture result. Sensitivity and specificity were
calculated, expressed with 95% confidence intervals.
Results:
In the primary analysis, a comparison of paired blood culture
and contemporaneous serum was undertaken. Of 11 candidaemic
patients, the paired serumwas PCR-positive in 4, generating sensitivity
of 36.4% (8.0
–
64.8%). Of the 39 control sera, 5 were PCR-positive,
generating specificity of 87.2% (76.7
–
97.7%). The sensitivity increased
to 63.3% (34.8
–
91.8%) in a secondary analysis when the serum samples
from the day before/after the positive blood culturewere included (7 of
11 detected).
Abstracts of FIS/HIS 2016
–
Poster Presentations / Journal of Hospital Infection 94S1 (2016) S24
–
S134
S76