Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  132 / 150 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 132 / 150 Next Page
Page Background

ID: 5013

Urinary catheter and CAUTI prevalence in hospitalized patients in a

large tertiary-care Italian hospital: results from a repeated data

point prevalence survey

Elisabetta Mantengoli

1

, Christopher Petrilli

2

, Lea Magistri

3

,

Maria Beatrice Pulci

3

, Alessandro Bartoloni

1

, Fabrizio Niccolini

3

,

Professional Unit

Healthcare Infection Prevention

3

.

1

Department of

Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence,

Italy;

2

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine,

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA;

3

Medical Direction, Careggi

University Hospital, Florence, Italy

Background:

Indwelling urinary catheters are often placed in the

hospital setting without an appropriate indication. Inappropriate use

of catheters may lead to complications including catheter-associated

urinary tract infection (CAUTI) and other non-infectious consequences

of urinary catheters.

Aim(s)/Objective(s):

In this study, we examined the appropriateness

of indwelling urinary catheters and the association with CAUTI among

hospitalized patients.

Method(s):

Six point prevalence surveys were conducted from a

random sampling of 1297 beds unit, semi-annually, beginning May

2012. Data on urinary catheter utilization and CAUTI were collected

from participating units. Since November 2014, we captured urinary

catheter appropriateness as defined by the international HICPAC

Guidelines 2014.

Results:

A mean of 599 patients (range 518

637) were analyzed

in each chart review. Overall catheter utilization was 38.3% (range

34.0

42.9%). Urinary catheters placed without an appropriate indica-

tion represented 19.7

21.5% of all catheters inserted. The CAUTI rate

since 2012, ranged from 1.1% to 5.4% with a higher CAUTI rate found in

patients with an inappropriate indication for a urinary catheter

compared with those with an appropriate indication (8.0% versus

4.2%). Microorganisms most commonly isolated were Gram negative

bacteria, such as

Escherichia coli

and

Klebsiella pneumoniae

.

Discussion and/or Conclusion(s):

The prevalence of CAUTI was lower

than that reported in literature. However, given the significantly

higher CAUTI rate seen in patients with an inappropriate indication,

further research to reduce the inappropriate use of urinary catheters

appears necessary.

ID: 5015

Epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

from screening samples

Rob Shorten

1

, Philip Ascroft

2

, Andy Dodgson

3

.

1

Public Health England,

2

Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust,

3

Public Health Laboratory

Manchester, Manchester Royal Infirmary

Background:

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE)

are a significant healthcare threat. Infections caused by them are

more problematic to manage due to reduced antimicrobial choice

and are associated with poorer outcomes. As they as transmissible

between individuals, their rapid detection in colonised patients is vital

in containing their spread and starting appropriate empirical

antimicrobials when required. Based on national guidelines and

local risk assessment, patients at Central Manchester Foundation

Trust are screened for colonisation with CPE using one of two

molecular methods; CARBA-R (Cepheid, Sunnydale, California) or an

in-house nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). Samples with a

positive NAAT are subsequently cultured to attempt to isolate the CPE.

Aim(s)/Objective(s):

To establish the epidemiology of CPE in screening

samples in this high incidence setting.

Method(s):

We retrospectively analysed the results of more than

68,000 rectal swabs submitted to the laboratory for the purpose of

screening for the carriage of CPE.

Results:

We present the epidemiology of KPC, OXA-48 and NDM,

including organism identification and susceptibility data in this large

cohort of patients.

ID: 5020

A comparison of the 2014

15 and 2015

16 Influenza seasons at

Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust

Jennifer Hart

1

, Tehmina Bharucha

2

, Ons El Hayet Ben Ismail

2

,

Beatrice Cockbain

2

, Joanna Ellis

3

, Angie Lackenby

3

, Dianne Irish

2

,

Tabitha Mahungu

2

, Tanzina Haque

2

, Paul Griffiths

2

.

1

Royal Free Hospital

London NHS Foundation Trust,

2

Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust,

3

Public Health England, Colindale

Background:

Influenza is a significant cause of morbidity and

mortality, with an estimated cost to the NHS of £286 million per

year. Viral and host factors are both known to influence patient

outcome.

Aim(s)/Objective(s):

To compare the 2014

15 and 2015

16 Influenza

seasons.

Method(s):

Information was obtained from patient records, internal

and referral laboratory reports.

Results:

During the 2014

15 Influenza season there were 247 cases

in total, with 177 (71.7%) Influenza A and 70 (28.3%) Influenza B. In

2015

16 there were 208 cases with 160 Influenza A (76.9%) and 48

Influenza B (23.1%). Of the Influenza A cases in 2014

15, 5 (2.0%) were

H1, 152 (61.5%) H3 and 20 (8.1%) untypeable. In 2015

16, 117 (56.3%)

were H1, 23 (11.1%) H3 and 20 (9.6%) untypeable.

In 2014

15, 203 (82.2%) patients received treatment for Influenza,

with 190 (76.9%) receiving Oseltamivir and 13 (5.3%) Zanamivir. In

2015

16, 122 (58.7%) patients received Oseltamivir and 2 (1.0%)

Zanamivir. Antiviral resistance to Oseltamivir affected 3 patients in

2014

15 with one of these isolates also low level resistant to

Zanamivir. No resistance was observed in 2015

16.

82 patients (33.2%) who contracted Influenza in 2014

15 were

immunosuppressed/pregnant, compared to 53 (25.5%) in 2015

16.

Mortality rate was 1.2% in 2014

15 and 1.0% in 2015

16.

Discussion and/or Conclusion(s):

There was a higher total number of

cases in 2014

15, with Influenza A H3 predominating, compared to

Influenza A H1 in 2015

16.

Vaccine mismatch may explain higher treatment rates in 2014

15 as

well as higher infection rates amongst immunosuppressed/pregnant

patients. Higher antiviral resistance rates in 2014

15 may also

reflect this.

ID: 5025

Evaluation of in-house prepared selective media for screening gut

colonization with carbapenemase producing enterobacteriaceae

(CPE)

Rajni Gaind

1

, Gajanand Mittal

1

, Monorama Deb

2

, P.k Verma

3

.

1

VMMC

and Safdarjung Hospital,

2

VMMC and Sfadrjung Hospital,

3

VMMC and

Safdarrjung Hospital

Background:

Most commercial media have been used to study coloni-

zation with KPC Enterobacteriaceae. Detection of Enterobacteriaceae

with NDM and OXA genes and with susceptibility to carbapenems is a

challenge

Aim(s)/Objective(s):

Performance of selective media for detection gut

colonization with CPE.

Method(s):

A total of 322 fecal samples were screened for CPE

using four in house prepared selective media: (i) overnight selective

enrichment in tryptic soy broth with a 10μg ertapenem disk. (CDC

protocol) (ii) MacConkey agar supplemented with imipenem at 1mg/L

(MacI), (iii) MacConkey agar supplemented with cefotaxime at 1mg/L

(MacC ESBL), (iv) MacConkey agar with standard Imipenem, Merope-

nem and Ertapenem Disk (10

μ

g Disk), (MacD). Isolates were screened

for KPC1 and 2, NDM-1, IMP, VIM, OXA- 48 and OXA-181.

Results:

A total of 444 morphologically distinct

Enterobacteriaceae

were isolated. 91 (20.5%)

Enterobacteriaceae

were CRE (ErtapenemMIC

>0.5 mg/L). Carbapenemase genes were detected in 50/91 CRE and

defined as CPE, 41/91 isolates were non CPE.

Among CPE, 38/50 were resistant to both imipenem and merope-

nem and 12 showed varied susceptibility. 38 CPE (76%) were

Abstracts of FIS/HIS 2016

Poster Presentations / Journal of Hospital Infection 94S1 (2016) S24

S134

S127